![[Opinion] Why Justice Nagarathna’s Call for Judges to Refrain from Social Media Is a Step Toward Upholding Judicial Integrity](https://legisorbis.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/1734021730714.png)
Judges Should Not Go To Facebook At All, Can’t Comment On Judgments, Says Supreme Court of India
The observations by Justice BV Nagarathna emphasizing that judges should refrain from using social media, especially to comment on judgments, are a timely reminder of the critical need to preserve judicial impartiality. Justice is not only about fair decision-making but also about maintaining public confidence in the judiciary’s independence and objectivity.
Judges expressing opinions on judgments on platforms like Facebook risk undermining this trust. Such actions may suggest a predetermined mindset, jeopardizing their ability to adjudicate impartially in future cases. This not only impacts the perception of fairness but can also adversely affect the rights of parties, particularly if the opinions relate to ongoing or contentious matters.
Judicial officers are entrusted with a unique responsibility that demands exceptional restraint and discretion. By avoiding social media commentary, judges uphold the principle that justice must not only be done but also be seen to be done. As Justice Nagarathna aptly pointed out, judges who accept their role must embrace the sacrifices it entails, including refraining from actions that may compromise the dignity of their office. This guidance serves to reinforce the judiciary’s role as a bastion of fairness and integrity in a rapidly changing digital landscape.